Special Assessments Do Not Need to be 10s of Thousands to be Unaffordable

As we hear of 87 to 187k special assessments that are being levied to some condo owners in Calgary, I read another story that reminds me that smaller assessments may be completely unaffordable.

96 year of Sarah Eisenber has lived in her Fort Lauderdale condo for 12 years, and the building (legally, there’s nothing nefarious here) is assessing a $6500 special assessment for storm window work (there’s big storms a coming!).

For many people, even young and first time purchasers, $6500 could be financed or borrowed against. But for a person who gets $1500/month in Social Security at the age or 96 – there is absolutely no recourse, no expected revenue to borrow against, and no savings.

For her, she had been budgeting on a predictable condominium contribution that she had been paying regularly – and never in default with. But a special assessment, even a smaller one will force her out of her home as the condominium legally forecloses the unit for the monies.

I guess there are two things to walk away from this story with.

One that the cost of livening in a condominium will always be monthly contribution and additional costs as determined. That’s the way it works. To budget without the special assessment possibility will put you behind on payments. That is simply the nature of condominium, and Sarah was in essence living in a house that was too expensive.

Two, that a well-run corporation should be able to predict and forecast this need (especially something like window/storm protection) – building a reserve over several years and having minimum impact on residents with a compromised ability to meet special assessments. As a board member, there is a responsibility to realize that not everyone had fiscal flexibility, and a good board tries to protect against additional unscheduled cash calls.

At 96, this is a tragic situation for Sarah. No ifs ands or butts. But it is a story that needs to be communicated to owners so they realize that the contribution alone may never be sufficient in meeting their fiscal responsibility to the condominium.